SC rules Tsunami Bill Constitutional

[TamilNet, Tuesday, 03 May 2005, 10:20 GMT]
The Supreme Court has communicated to the Speaker of the parliament that the Tsunami (Special Provisions) Bill is consistent with the Constitution of Sri Lanka. Mr.W.M.J.Lokkubandara informed the determination of the Supreme Court to the parliament when it met Tuesday morning, legal sources said.

The SC Bench comprised Justices Shiranee Tilakawardene, K.Udalagama, and Saleem Marsoof held inquiry into petitions filed by the Children's Desk of Lawyers for Human Rights and Development and the Citizens' Trust challenging the constitutionality of the Bill which was presented in Parliament on April 5 by the Justice and Judicial reforms Minister.

The petitioners wanted special determination of the Supreme Court citing the Attorney General as respondent, legal sources said.

The Minister tabled the Bill to ensure that children and young persons left without parental care due to the tsunami received alternate care and protection, legal sources said.

The Lawyers for Human Rights and Development in its petition argued that several clauses in Part 11 of the Bill were inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution. It alleged that a clause as it is formulated, may cause grave injustice to members of extended families, who may have provided care and shelter to children whose parents were affected by the tsunami, by exposing them to the risk of being prosecuted and punished for on offence committed by them, legal sources said.

The petition filed by the Citizens' Trust inter alia disputes the issuance of death certificates. It further stated that the period of one month prescribed in Clause 2 of the Bill is too short for presumption of death to arise and may result in living persons being wrongfully declared as dead and thereby deprive them of all their constitutional rights including franchise. However the petition pointed out that, in any event, since more than three months had elapsed after the tsunami, such a provision was now futile, legal sources said.

The Supreme Court, after inquiry, held the Bill is consistent with the Constitution subject to any revision, legal sources said.

 

Latest 15 Reports
04.02.24 15:40   Photo
சியோனிசம் காணும் தோல்வி ஈழத்தமிழருக்குப் பலன் தரவல்ல படிமை மாற்றத்தின் அறிகுறி
24.04.22 05:44  
தீவின் நெருக்கடிச் சூழலில் ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசம் கடைப்பிடிக்கவேண்டிய நிலைப்பாடுகள்
09.04.22 14:44   Photo
குறிதவறும் ஈழத்தமிழர் தலைமைகளுக்கு வரலாறு தருகின்ற எச்சரிக்கை
21.01.22 07:24   Photo
ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசத்தின் தலைமைத்துவம் தேர்தல் அரசியற் கட்சிகளுக்கு அப்பாலானது
02.11.21 15:32   Photo
13 ஆம் சட்டத்திருத்தத்தால் கட்டமைக்கப்பட்ட இன அழிப்பை எதிர்கொள்ள முடியுமா?
15.09.21 08:19  
English version not available
17.05.21 19:23   Photo
Ananthi blames war criminal Silva for blocking collective memorial at Mu'l'livaaykkaal
09.04.21 14:46  
English version not available
23.03.21 12:41   Photo
No focus on Tamil genocide, geopolitics gets played out in Geneva in favour of QUAD formation
21.03.21 13:34   Photo
Navi Pillay explains ‘human rights’ limitations in Geneva on Tamil genocide
15.03.21 20:36   Photo
Deceived Tamil activists in UK falsely claimed ‘substantial changes’ to Zero draft
09.03.21 21:34   Photo
UK repeatedly wronged Tamils says hunger-striker, demands genocide justice
26.02.21 11:53   Photo
Tamils witness false dilemma in Geneva as geopolitical formations pit against each other
19.02.21 14:02   Photo
UK not prepared to push for ICC option in new UNHRC Resolution
07.02.21 23:16   Photo
Unprecedented P2P uprising paves the way for rights-oriented politics of Tamils and Muslims
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=14800