US Patriot Act provisions struck down by NewYork Judge

[TamilNet, Saturday, 08 September 2007, 02:12 GMT]
Southern District of New York Judge Victor Marrero Thursday ruled unconstitutional a provision in the Patriot Act authorizing the FBI to issue a form of administrative subpoena, called a National Security Letter (NSL), to demand e-mail and telephone data from private companies for counterterrorism investigations, violates the 1st Amendment and constitutional provisions on the separation of powers, legal sources in US close to the court ruling said Thursday.

FBI Logo
Marrero, who was appointed by President Clinton in 1999, warned of "far-reaching invasions of liberty" when courts refuse to set limits on government power. He pointed specifically to Supreme Court rulings that sanctioned the internment of Japanese-Americans in World War II and upheld racial segregation in schools and other public accommodations, a front page story in the Washington Post Friday issue said.

PDF IconMarrero ruling on Doe V. Gonzales (3Mb)
Marrero's decision would bar the use of NSLs to demand data from electronic communications companies, a procedure that was the focus of the lawsuit.

But the ruling appears to leave untouched the FBI's ability to demand bank records, credit reports and other financial data related to counterterrorism and other probes, because those authorities are covered by other statutes, said legal experts according to Washington Post.

Unlike other subpoenas and warrants, no approval from the judicial branch is required to issue an NSL.

"The risk of investing the FBI with unchecked discretion to restrict such speech is that government agents, based on their own self-certification, may limit speech that does not pose a significant threat to national security or other compelling government interest," Marrero said.

The lack of judicial oversight was at the core of Doe v. Ashcroft, a high-profile test of the usage of NSLs. Brought forward by an unnamed Internet Service Provider who had been served with NSLs, it challenged the constitutionality of the letters, specifically the non-disclosure provisions.

Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York found, on 28 September 2004, that NSLs violate the Fourth ("it has the effect of authorizing coercive searches effectively immune from any judicial process") and First Amendments.


Related Articles:
25.08.07   Australia terror prosecution debacle
12.07.07   Anti-terror Laws
28.05.07   Sloganeering Terror, Strategizing War


External Links:
Wiki: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
Wiki: National Security Letter
USLaw: Federal Judge Rules Unconstitutional Parts of Patriot Act

 

Latest 15 Reports
24.04.22 05:44  
தீவின் நெருக்கடிச் சூழலில் ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசம் கடைப்பிடிக்கவேண்டிய நிலைப்பாடுகள்
09.04.22 14:44   Photo
குறிதவறும் ஈழத்தமிழர் தலைமைகளுக்கு வரலாறு தருகின்ற எச்சரிக்கை
21.01.22 07:24   Photo
ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசத்தின் தலைமைத்துவம் தேர்தல் அரசியற் கட்சிகளுக்கு அப்பாலானது
02.11.21 15:32   Photo
13 ஆம் சட்டத்திருத்தத்தால் கட்டமைக்கப்பட்ட இன அழிப்பை எதிர்கொள்ள முடியுமா?
15.09.21 08:19  
English version not available
17.05.21 19:23   Photo
Ananthi blames war criminal Silva for blocking collective memorial at Mu'l'livaaykkaal
09.04.21 14:46  
English version not available
23.03.21 12:41   Photo
No focus on Tamil genocide, geopolitics gets played out in Geneva in favour of QUAD formation
21.03.21 13:34   Photo
Navi Pillay explains ‘human rights’ limitations in Geneva on Tamil genocide
15.03.21 20:36   Photo
Deceived Tamil activists in UK falsely claimed ‘substantial changes’ to Zero draft
09.03.21 21:34   Photo
UK repeatedly wronged Tamils says hunger-striker, demands genocide justice
26.02.21 11:53   Photo
Tamils witness false dilemma in Geneva as geopolitical formations pit against each other
19.02.21 14:02   Photo
UK not prepared to push for ICC option in new UNHRC Resolution
07.02.21 23:16   Photo
Unprecedented P2P uprising paves the way for rights-oriented politics of Tamils and Muslims
22.01.21 08:01   Photo
Gotabaya sets up deceptive COI citing ‘sovereignty’ and ‘non-aligned’ foreign policy
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=23213