Sarath case Hearing continues

[TamilNet, Tuesday, 08 February 2000, 04:55 GMT]
President's Counsel Ranjith Abeysuriya told the Supreme Court yesterday that the exercise of power by the Chief Justice to constitute a Court to hear the case against him was unreasonable. Mr. Abeysuriya was supporting the application that challenges the appointment of Mr. Sarath Silva as Chief Justice.

Mr.Abeysuriya raised a preliminary objection that the Court was not constituted in compliance with the provisions of the constitution.

Court:- Are you objecting to our sitting here to hear this case?

Counsel:- No

Court:- So you are objecting to the order made by the Chief Justice?

Counsel:- In that case the Supreme Court sitting to hear a case under the Fundamental Rights jurisdiction cannot exercise writ jurisdiction.

Counsel:- Supreme Court can interpret the provisions of the constitution.

Court:- There is no interpretation involved in this. This matter should have been raised in a different forum, the Court of Appeal.

Mr.Abeysuriya continued, "if there is one principle which runs through the entire fabric of the constitution it is the principle of the Rule of Law, and under the Constitution it is the judiciary which is entrusted with the task of keeping every organ of the State within the limits of the law, thereby making the Rule of Law meaningful and effective.

"Judges should be of stern stuff and tough fibre, unbending before power, economic or political, and they must uphold the core principle of the Rule of Law which says "Be you ever so high, the Law is above you."

"This is the principle of independence of the Judiciary which is vital for the establishment of real participatory democracy, maintenance of the Rule of Law as a dynamic concept and the delivery of social justice to the vulnerable sections fo the community," Mr. Abeysuriya added.

The Bench comprised Justice Wadugodapitiya, Justice Kulatunga, Justice Prijantha Perera, Justice D.P.S.Gunasekera, Justice Shiranie Bandaranayaka, Justice Ameer Ismail and Justice Weerasekera.

Ravaya Editor Victor Ivan, Sunday Times Deputy Editor Rajpal Abeynaike and A.Jayasekera are the petitioners in the case.

Further hearing continues.


Related Articles:
01.12.99   Sarath case descends into farce

 

Latest 15 Reports
24.04.22 05:44  
தீவின் நெருக்கடிச் சூழலில் ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசம் கடைப்பிடிக்கவேண்டிய நிலைப்பாடுகள்
09.04.22 14:44   Photo
குறிதவறும் ஈழத்தமிழர் தலைமைகளுக்கு வரலாறு தருகின்ற எச்சரிக்கை
21.01.22 07:24   Photo
ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசத்தின் தலைமைத்துவம் தேர்தல் அரசியற் கட்சிகளுக்கு அப்பாலானது
02.11.21 15:32   Photo
13 ஆம் சட்டத்திருத்தத்தால் கட்டமைக்கப்பட்ட இன அழிப்பை எதிர்கொள்ள முடியுமா?
15.09.21 08:19  
English version not available
17.05.21 19:23   Photo
Ananthi blames war criminal Silva for blocking collective memorial at Mu'l'livaaykkaal
09.04.21 14:46  
English version not available
23.03.21 12:41   Photo
No focus on Tamil genocide, geopolitics gets played out in Geneva in favour of QUAD formation
21.03.21 13:34   Photo
Navi Pillay explains ‘human rights’ limitations in Geneva on Tamil genocide
15.03.21 20:36   Photo
Deceived Tamil activists in UK falsely claimed ‘substantial changes’ to Zero draft
09.03.21 21:34   Photo
UK repeatedly wronged Tamils says hunger-striker, demands genocide justice
26.02.21 11:53   Photo
Tamils witness false dilemma in Geneva as geopolitical formations pit against each other
19.02.21 14:02   Photo
UK not prepared to push for ICC option in new UNHRC Resolution
07.02.21 23:16   Photo
Unprecedented P2P uprising paves the way for rights-oriented politics of Tamils and Muslims
22.01.21 08:01   Photo
Gotabaya sets up deceptive COI citing ‘sovereignty’ and ‘non-aligned’ foreign policy
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=4635