SC commences inquiry into constitutional amendment petitions

[TamilNet, Tuesday, 01 October 2002, 17:02 GMT]
Thirty-two petitions filed against the eighteenth and nineteenth constitutional amendments tabled by the United National Front government were taken up for inquiry before a seven-member bench of the Supreme Court, Tuesday. The Chief Justice earlier named a five-member bench to hear the petitions filed by opposition parties, civil groups and individuals.

According to the draft eighteenth amendment the members of the Constitutional Council (CC) and other members of the independent commissions for Election, Police, Judiciary and Public Service cannot be prosecuted in courts and no decision of the Constitutional Council can be challenged in courts including the SC on the grounds of fundamental rights violations.

According to the nineteenth amendment, the President cannot dissolve parliament after one year of its existence arbitrarily and also parliamentarians who vote for the said amendment cannot be expelled from any party.

The main opposition People’s Alliance, Sri Lanka Freedom Party, Lanka Sama Samaja Party, Liberal Party, Sinhala Jathika Sangamaya, are among the political groups that have filed petitions challenging the constitutionality of the 18 and 19th amendments.

The petitioners have requested the SC to determine that the said amendments are not in consistent with the Constitution and in addition to the passage in parliament with two third majority these amendments should be approved at a referendum.

The bench comprised the Chief Justice Mr.Sarath N.Silva (Chairman), Justices S.W.B.Wadugodapitiya, Ameer Ismail, Shiranee Bandaranaike, P.Edussuriya, Hector S.Yapa and Asoka de Silva.

President Counsel Mr. H.L.De Silva who appeared for the main opposition People’s Alliance in his submission said that the proposed nineteenth amendment would directly affects the sovereignty of the people and franchise. The said amendment will take away the powers of the President to dissolve parliament in power.

Attorney Mr.R.K.W.Gunasekara appearing on behalf of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party in his submission said that disciplinary action couldn’t be taken against any parliamentarian who voted for the nineteenth amendment. This would create problems in maintaining party discipline. The constitutional amendment should be approved at a referendum.

Further inquiry was put off for October 3.


Latest 15 Reports
04.02.24 15:40   Photo
சியோனிசம் காணும் தோல்வி ஈழத்தமிழருக்குப் பலன் தரவல்ல படிமை மாற்றத்தின் அறிகுறி
24.04.22 05:44  
தீவின் நெருக்கடிச் சூழலில் ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசம் கடைப்பிடிக்கவேண்டிய நிலைப்பாடுகள்
09.04.22 14:44   Photo
குறிதவறும் ஈழத்தமிழர் தலைமைகளுக்கு வரலாறு தருகின்ற எச்சரிக்கை
21.01.22 07:24   Photo
ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசத்தின் தலைமைத்துவம் தேர்தல் அரசியற் கட்சிகளுக்கு அப்பாலானது
02.11.21 15:32   Photo
13 ஆம் சட்டத்திருத்தத்தால் கட்டமைக்கப்பட்ட இன அழிப்பை எதிர்கொள்ள முடியுமா?
15.09.21 08:19  
English version not available
17.05.21 19:23   Photo
Ananthi blames war criminal Silva for blocking collective memorial at Mu'l'livaaykkaal
09.04.21 14:46  
English version not available
23.03.21 12:41   Photo
No focus on Tamil genocide, geopolitics gets played out in Geneva in favour of QUAD formation
21.03.21 13:34   Photo
Navi Pillay explains ‘human rights’ limitations in Geneva on Tamil genocide
15.03.21 20:36   Photo
Deceived Tamil activists in UK falsely claimed ‘substantial changes’ to Zero draft
09.03.21 21:34   Photo
UK repeatedly wronged Tamils says hunger-striker, demands genocide justice
26.02.21 11:53   Photo
Tamils witness false dilemma in Geneva as geopolitical formations pit against each other
19.02.21 14:02   Photo
UK not prepared to push for ICC option in new UNHRC Resolution
07.02.21 23:16   Photo
Unprecedented P2P uprising paves the way for rights-oriented politics of Tamils and Muslims
Find this article at: